|
One's first response to Tibet
today is likely to be shock - compounded by a
piercing sadness if one remembers the way Lhasa's
higgledy-piggledy jumble of two-story whitewashed
houses (rainbow awnings fluttering from every
one) looked only a few years ago. The sign that
greets you at Gongkar Airport announces PETRO
CHINA, and a nearby building proclaims THE LHASA
AIRPORT OF CHINA (Beijing has never been slow
to understand the power of visible symbols). And
as you complete the 90-minute drive into the Tibetan
capital, you are greeted by a classic propaganda
billboard of Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, and Jiang
Zemin beaming beside the Potala Palace, China
Mobile banners flapping from every lamppost. Only
a dozen years ago you could see that astonishing
monument from almost every point in Lhasa; now
it is hidden behind tall buildings and new developments.
And yet the more time I spent in Tibet last summer,
and the more I walked around its markets, villages,
and lapis-and-jade lakes, the less I noticed the
signs of Chinese imperialism, and the more I felt
was meeting a Tibetan spirit that seems unquenchable.
Tibet lives mostly in the corners and shadows
these days, under its breath, and you have to
seek it out. On the surface, Lhasa looks like
an Eastern version of Las Vegas: one long strip
of ultramodern department stores and gaudy karaoke
parlors plunked down incongruously in a desert.
For the many Chinese who pile aboard the China
Southwest planes from Chengdu, which fly to Lhasa
several times a day in summer, Tibet represents
a kind of Wild West, a Chinese Alaska of outdoors
adventure and job opportunities. Yet for the foreigner
drawn to the culture for its devotion and its
otherworldliness, there are still traces, every-where,
of an older, changeless East.
I first came to Lhasa in 1985,
only months after it had been opened to outsiders.
I discovered a festival of hope and light: Tibetans
excited to encounter visitors really for the first
time, and foreigners somewhat astonished to find
themselves within a "Forbidden Kingdom" that,
in all its history until 1950, had seen fewer
than 2,000 people from the West. Photographs of
the Dalai Lama filled the altars of the temples,
shy monks came out from their prayer halls to
toy with my camera and at night the few of us
who'd made it into this city 3,300 meters above
sea level sat on our terraces and watched the
Potala under a full moon. When I returned five
years later, Tibet was pitch-black. Soldiers patrolled
the rooftops of the low buildings around the Jokhang
Temple, Tibet's holiest monument-demonstrations
on behalf of Tibetan independence had put them
on alert-and tanks were never far away. Tibetan
were even forbidden to visit the Potala Palace,
the former home of the Dalai Lama, and the handful
of tourists allowed in were led through a largely
bolted place where the power often failed.
Today
Tibet is some respects better off than it was
then, although it looks less and less like itself.
Tibetan fill the temples now, and the more entrepreneurial
among them speak English and do good business.
Tourists are generally horrified by the Italian
ice-cream parlor and the signs for Giordano and
Jeans West on every other plate glass window,
but the Tibetans don't seem to object to them,
or to mind the better facilities and the cleaner
streets they accompany. (The little guesthouse
where in 1985 I shared a single cold-water tap
in a courtyard and filthy hole in the ground with
30 or so others now offers Japanese food on its
rooftop and The Doors' Greatest Hits.)
The Dalai Lama himself has often said that discos
around the Potala are "no problem" so long as
something more important, his people's faith and
livelihood, is respected.
Thus Tibet both alarms and uplifts
at every turn, its kitschy, factitious
new surfaces undermined by a spirit that is committed
and wary and fierce. As I admired the vista outside
a small window in the Potala one day, a young
Tibetan said: "For view, it's beautiful. But for
huma right?" Pictures of the Dalai Lama are now
kept under wraps, at home, if at all, and though
Tashi Lhumpo Monastery in Shigatse is a sumptuous
feast for visitors, its abbot was until recently
one of hundreds being kept in prison. Many Tibetans
will tell you harrowing stories of how they smuggled
their children out of the country, a cross hazardous
mountain passes, to an India where, although their
parents may never see them, they can learn in
freedom about Tibetan culture and history.
Perhaps the saddest sight in Tibet
today is the lines of monks, on shopping streets
and in monasteries, sitting on the ground, rocking
back and forth over their prayers, and then extending
their hands for alms. When I rested one sunny
afternoon in a new Chinese amusement park across
from the Potala, complete with swan boats and
grinning tourists dressed up (for a moment) as
Tibetan noblemen, two little girls of six of seven
came up and ran their fingers across my face,
cooing, "Give me money. Give me pen." In many
of the most beautiful chapels in the temples you
are asked to pay to use a camera, and in some
the posted price for using a video camera is US$250.
And yet one way that Tibet has
always challenged visitors is by refusing to present
itself in black and white. Some
of the friendliest shopkeepers and taxi drivers
I met in Lhasa and Shigatse were, in fact, Chinese
migrants from neighboring Sichuan province, here
for the jobs they cannot
get at home. The Mainland tourists pouring off
the planes in zippy Discover Tibet baseball craps,
or sitting in the sunny courtyard of the Yak Hotel
reading old copies of Lost Horizon are,
perhaps in some cases, the people who can do the
most to help Tibet. The Dalai Lama (unlike Nelson
Mandela in apartheid South Africa, or Aung San
Suu Kyi in oppressed Myanmar) has never asked
foreigners to boycott Tibet; to turn one's back
on the culture is, in effect, to condemn it to
a slow death under house arrest. Only visitors
can convey to the world the needs and suffering
of the Tibetans.
What I found, then, as I drove
across the spectacular 4,600-meter passes that
link Lhasa to Gyantse, as I visited temples whose
thousand-year-old murals have been protected,
or looked in on hangouts like the Boiling Point
Internet Bar, was a place that can often make
you weep but does not necessarily leave you disappointed.
On the one hand, gaudy yellow and red banners
in the streets of Lhasa announce, WELCOME TO PARTICIPATION
IN TIBET HOLYLAND TOUR FESTIVAL and PARADISE OF
ALL DREAM SEEKERS, as if to mock the sacred traditions
that Beijing has turned into a theme park; on
the other, there are Tibetans all around whose
magnetism and warmth are just as strong and touching
as when I first visited 18 years ago. Likewise,
the rail line linking Golmud and Lhasa, which
Beijing is hoping to complete by 2007, seems certain
to accelerate the Han settlement of Tibet (and
the US$2 to $3 million being spent on the project
is more than local government has put toward health
and education in 50 years combine); yet the Tibetan
sense of self seems, if anything, to have instensified
in reponse to pressures brough to bear on it.
The traditional marketplace around the Barkhor
in Lhasa, for example, bustles with people selling
false teeth and pieces of watermelon, and with
friendly local smiling even as soldiers goose-step
behind them.
Tibet today is essentially two
different countries living on top of, and around,
and even inside one another: a
worn Tibetan amulet inside a gaudy Chinese box.
Go to the Jokhang Temple in the afternoon, say,
and it's all tourists in cowboy hats strolling
around the rooftops and flashing their cameras.
But go in the morning and you'll see nothing but
a long line of pilgrims, some from the farthest
reaches of eastern Tibet, the whole dark place
an enchantment of flickering candles and muttered
chants and unceasing prostrations. Similarly at
the Potala, Tibetans make the "pilgrims' ascent"
up the palace's front steps in the early afternoon,
and go through its rooms in the proper ceremonial
order. Tourists tend to visit in the morning,
ascending the back side and coming down through
its room in opposite direction. Sometimes the
two converge. In one dark chamber containing a
throne that belonged to the sixth Dalai Lama and
some pricelsess statues, I saw a lone monk chanting
in the sunlight. A group of noisy tourists came
into the room, joke around, threw some trash into
a panda-shaped trash can, and then disappeared.
The low, steady chant continued throughout.
As I stayed longer in Tibet, I
started going out in the early morning, when figures
were just outlines in the darkened alleyways,
and joining the first pilgrims on their ritual
circumambulation of the Jokhang. No tourists were
visible at that hour, just old women furiously
spinning their prayer wheels as they walked, and
occasional nomads shouting out their supplications.
Girls diligently swept the area in front of their
stalls and shops, and here and there a monk on
the ground murmured his sutras. High above, the
Potala slowly came to light, while on either side
of the Jokhang two furnaces, in which pilgrims
pour gasoline and stoke juniper branches to release
a scented mist, began to glow. All that was visible
of the low dark chamber immediately in front of
the temple, slippery with melted butter, were
lines of tiny flickering candles throwing light
into the faces of those who tended them.
Around me were signs for the Lhasa
Satellite Conference and even, next to one Tibetan-owned
guesthouse, a gold plaque: EXEMPLARY SITE OF SPIRITUAL
DEVELOPMENT IN TOURIST INDUSTRY. To my left was
a bolted door, above which was ominously written,
JOKHANG SQUARE CONTROL OFFICE. Yet in front of
me-and inside me now-were long lines of candles,
flickering before the holiest site in Tibet, as
it was once and as it is now.
Source: Picoiyer
-Destiasian
top
>> more
news
|